| Volume 6, Number 2 * May 2006 | |
|
JAPAN
PLANS TO CHANGE RULES ON CLINICAL TRIALS Currently, any new drug requesting approval by the PMDA must first undergo clinical trials, in which a certain minimum proportion of subjects must be ethnic Japanese. This requirement is in place because of concern for the potential variance in a drug’s effect depending on the subject’s ethnicity. This is one of the reasons that the Japanese government is wary of accepting significant foreign clinical data for approval of a new drug. Mr. Miyajima has suggested that the PMDA may consider accepting data on other Asian subjects in lieu of requiring data on people of Japanese descent only. In addition, the relaxed clinical data requirements could be supplemented with stronger post-market surveillance to monitor any side effects of new drugs. Mr. Miyajima stated that the PMDA hoped to issue the new guidelines within the next year.
Corruption in the medical sector in China is rampant, as evidenced by the arrests of several SFDA officials on charges of bribery earlier this year. SFDA officials responsible for approving new drugs, including the director of the department of Drug Registration, have been accused of accepting bribes from drug companies wanting to push through approval of their drugs. Drug companies that sell drugs whose prices have been cut by the National Development and Reform Commission’s have also been known to register the same drug under a different name. In doing so, they are able to get around the price cuts, marketing the so-called “new” drug at a higher price. Corruption throughout the drug industry and the government resulted in the approval of some thousands of new drugs in 2004, compared to about 150 new drugs in the U.S. Drug companies also bribe doctors, hospital administrators, and health officials to ensure that their drugs are used or prescribed. Hospitals have the incentive to cooperate because they generate most of their income from drug sales. The Chinese Minister of Health will lead the team responsible for overseeing the crackdown on commercial bribery in the medical sector. In addition to this new campaign, the SFDA has gotten tough on corruption in the past year, withdrawing over 60 licenses and destroying over 450 illegal drug factories.
As mentioned in last month’s newsletter, there are a number of items that need to be provided in the dossier, which are outlined in Form 40 and Schedules I and II. Providing only partial data in the application (with the rest to be submitted later) will not work, according to our local sources in India. One of the risks of submitting partial data is that the manufacturer would have paid the application fees of $1,500 per factory and $1,000 per product, and then the application may be rejected. The manufacturer might need to start the process all over again (and perhaps have to pay the fees again). Despite this extension until June 30, the consequences of a late application are not spelled out yet. In addition, no one can commit that a late application will or will not be accepted.
Until now, the administrative
acceptance, technical evaluation, and approval processes were “bundled.”
The new Administrative Service Center separates the administrative process from
the evaluation and approval processes, and will only perform “format”
checks instead of substantial content checks. The new center will serve as a
one-stop shop for these administrative services and will be held accountable
for processing applications within certain time limits. The stated goal of the
new center is to provide open, transparent, efficient, and convenient services
to the applicants. It is also hoped that the increased transparency and accountability
promoted by the new service center will help to minimize the opportunity for
corruption in the SFDA. |
|
Read more >> Newsletter Archive